HERMAN A. UIHLEIN, AUGUST E. UIHLEIN, GEORGE UIHLEIN ET AL.
v.
STATE OF WISCONSIN, NEELE B. NEELEN, PUBLIC ADMINISTRATOR OF MILWAUKEE COUNTY, ET AL.
HERMAN A. UIHLEIN, AUGUST E. UIHLEIN, GEORGE UIHLEIN ET AL.
STATE OF WISCONSIN, NEELE B. NEELEN, PUBLIC ADMINISTRATOR OF MILWAUKEE COUNTY, ET AL.
273 U.S. 642
Supreme Court of the United States (1926)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Reversed on the authority of Schlesinger v. Wisconsin, 270 U. S. 230.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Donnan v. Heiner (W.D. Pa. 1931)…nth Amendment is the equivalent of “due process of law” of the Fifth Amendment. We feel, therefore, that no extended consideration need be given the alleged distinction. The Sehlesinger Case was affirmed by the Supreme Court in Uihlein v. Wisconsin, 273 U. S. 642, 47 S. Ct. 110, 71 L. Ed. 818. Judgment will be entered for the plaintiffs upon the affidavit of defense raising questions of law.…
Authorities Cited
- Schlesinger v. Wisconsin, 270 U.S. 230 (U.S. 1926)