C. A. P. TURNER COMPANY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Booth v. United States, 291 U.S. 339 (U.S. 1934)
  …but continues to act under it. He loses his seniority in office, but that fact, in itself, attests that he remains in office. A retired District Judge need not be assigned to sit in his own district. Maxwell v. United States, 3 F. (2d) 906; affirmed 271 U.S. 647. And if a retired judge is called upon by the Chief Justice or a Senior Circuit Judge to sit in another district or circuit, and he responds and serves there, his status is the same as that of any active judge, so called. McDonough v. United States,…
• TWO Guys From Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. McGINLEY, 266 F.2d 427 (3d Cir. 1959)
  …having been consented to and confirmed by the Chief Judge of the Circuit, a formal designation was not vital or indispensable to his jurisdiction or competency. Maxwell v. United States, 4 Cir., 1925, 3 F.2<1 906, 907-908. affirmed per curiam 1926, 271 U.S. 647, 46 S.Ct. 487, 70 L.Ed. 1130. In any event, Judge Welsh had the power of a de facto judge. Ball v. United States, supra; McDowell v. United States, supra; Ex parte Ward, 1899, 173 U.S. 452, 19 S.Ct. 459, 43 L.Ed. 765; Luhrig Collieries Co. v. Inter…

Authorities Cited

• Stone v. United States, 164 U.S. 380 (U.S. 1896)
• United States v. Smith, 94 U.S. 214 (U.S. 1876)
• Talbert v. United States, 155 U.S. 45 (U.S. 1894)
• Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co. v. United States, 260 U.S. 125 (U.S. 1922)