ISRAEL SELIGMAN
v.
FRANK K. BOWERS, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE SECOND DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, AND DAVID H. BLAIR, UNITED STATES COMMISSIONER, ETC.
ISRAEL SELIGMAN
FRANK K. BOWERS, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE SECOND DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, AND DAVID H. BLAIR, UNITED STATES COMMISSIONER, ETC.
271 U.S. 642
Supreme Court of the United States (1926)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 238 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of February 13, 1925, c. 229, sec. 1, 43 Stat. 938.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Marsino v. Hogsett (D. Mass. 1930)…rcising the power. While Marsino’s conviction was reviewed by the Supreme Court of Massachusetts (Marsino v. Commonwealth, 252 Mass. 224, 147 N. E. 859), and a writ of error to the United States Supreme Court was dismissed (Marsino v. Massachusetts, 271 U. S. 642, 46 S. Ct. 472, 70 L. Ed. 1127), it appears from the report of the ease in the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, and in briefs filed by the commonwealth in the Supreme Court of the United States, that neither of these courts considered the quest…
-
Marsino v. Hogsett (D. Mass. 1930)…on or statutes of the United States. He has been twice to the United States Supreme Court on matters arising out of the prosecution in question. Marsino v. United States, 270 U. S. 627, 46 S. Ct. 206, 70 L. Ed. 768; Marsino v. Commonwealth of Mass., 271 U. S. 642, 46 S. Ct. 472, 70 L. Ed. 1127. In the first of these eases, it was held that the Attorney General of the United States did not exceed his powers in directing that the petitioner, while confined in execution of a federal sentence, be taken into the…