BENJAMIN GRATZ
v.
JAMES S. MCKEE, NELLIE CANON BLIVEN, EXECUTRIX OF WILLIAM E. BLIVEN, DECEASED, ET AL.
BENJAMIN GRATZ
JAMES S. MCKEE, NELLIE CANON BLIVEN, EXECUTRIX OF WILLIAM E. BLIVEN, DECEASED, ET AL.
270 U.S. 664
Supreme Court of the United States (1926)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Eastman v. United States, 212 F.2d 320 (9th Cir. 1954)…were made before the termination of the agency. F. W. Martin & Co. v. Cobb, 8 Cir., 1940, 110 F. 2d 159; Lyons Milling Co. v. Goffe & Carkener, 10 Cir., 1931, 46 F. 2d 241, 83 A.L.R. 501; Gratz v. McKee, 8 Cir., 1926, 9 F. 2d 593, certiorari denied 270 U.S. 664, 46 S.Ct. 472, 70 L.Ed. 788. If it [*323] could be said, which we doubt, that Harding was at one time an agent of the Government,3 it clearly appears that the relationship had terminated before the claimed admissions were made. Judgment affirmed.…
-
Am. Nat. Bank of Sapulpa v. Bartlett, 40 F.2d 21 (10th Cir. 1930)…rincipal, as to the existence or extent of his authority, are not admissible. Atlas Land Co. v. Hendriks (8 C. C. A.) 298 P. 589; Deming Ladies’ Hospital Ass’n v. Priee (8 C. C. A.) 276 F. 668; Gratz v. McKee (8 C. C. A.) 9 F.(2d) 593, cert. denied, 270 U. S. 664, 46 S. Ct. 472, 70 L. Ed. 788; Durant Motor Co. of New Jersey v. Georgia-Florida Motor Co. (5 C. C. A.) 18 F.(2d) 95; Manjon v. Lebron (1 C. C. A.) 23 F.(2d) 266. 2. It is conceded that m> express authority to execute this mortgage had been conferr…
-
J. J. Henry Co., Inc. v. The United States, 411 F.2d 1246 (Ct. Cl. 1969)…on of the Fifth Amendment. The amendment has limited application to the relative rights in property of parties litigant which have been voluntarily created by contract. Consolidation Coal Co. v. United States, 60 Ct.Cl. 608 (1925), appeal dismissed, 270 U.S. 664, 46 S.Ct. 204, 70 L.Ed. 788 (1926); Klebe v. United States, 57 Ct. Cl. 160 (1922), aff’d, 263 U.S. 188, 44 S.Ct. 58, 68 L.Ed. 244 (1923). See generally 2 Nichols, Eminent Domain § 6.1 (3d ed. 1963). Where, however, the government has not asserted it…