STATE INDUSTRIAL BOARD OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK AND LOUIS ANDERSON
v.
JOHNSON LIGHTERAGE COMPANY AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORPORATION, LTD.
STATE INDUSTRIAL BOARD OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK AND LOUIS ANDERSON
JOHNSON LIGHTERAGE COMPANY AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORPORATION, LTD.
270 U.S. 655
Supreme Court of the United States (1926)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Mobile Steel Co. v. Lester Y. Diamond in Bankr. for Mobile Steel, Inc., 563 F.2d 692 (5th Cir. 1977)…S.Ct. 467, 91 L.Ed. 504 (1947). [*702] es the debt for all purposes in the case unless the objector not only denies it but produces some evidence to the contrary.2 Matter of Hannevig (C.C.A. 2d Cir.), 7 Am. B.R.(N.S.) 406, 10 F.(2d) 941, cert. den. 270 U.S. 655, 46 S.Ct. 353, 70 L.Ed. 783 . . The adoption of the Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure has not altered these principles. Rule 301(b) provides: A proof of claim executed and filed in accordance with these rules shall constitute prima facie evidence of t…
-
Green Farms Produce, Inc. v. Phelan & Taylor Produce Co., 381 F.2d 788 (9th Cir. 1967)…ngth in this opinion, we find no error of law on the part of the district court or the Referee. See Whitney v. Dresser, 200 U.S. 532, 26 S.Ct. 316, 50 L.Ed. 584 (1906), and In re Hannevig, 10 F. 2d 941 (2d Cir.) cert, denied sub nom. Wise v. Kettle, 270 U.S. 655, 46 S.Ct. 353, 70 L.Ed. 783 (1925), and we hold that the findings of fact are not clearly erroneous. The orders appealed from are affirmed.…