WILLIAM F. PURSGLOVE
v.
MONONGAHELA RAILWAY COMPANY

U.S. | 1926-03-15
No. 956
270 U.S. 654 Supreme Court of the United States (1926) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Central R. R. of New Jersey v. Breisch, 112 F.2d 595 (3d Cir. 1940)
    …6], supra, and cases there cited), and the exercise of this jurisdiction has been approved on appeal to the United States Supreme Court. McMahon v. Montour R. Co., supra; Pursglove v. [Monongahela] R. [Co.], 285 Pa. 27, 131 A. 477, certiorari denied 270 U.S. 654, 46 S.Ct. 352, 70 L.Ed. 783.”, and “Our Workmen’s Compensation Act gave to a board exclusive jurisdiction of proceedings to adjudicate claims of employees, which, by consent, express or implied, it was agreed should be so disposed of, and, as to suc…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw