CITY OF FORT SMITH, ARKANSAS, ET AL.
v.
SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY

U.S. | 1926-01-25
No. 151
270 U.S. 627 Supreme Court of the United States (1926) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed with costs, upon the authority of Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co., 258 U. S. 165, 175; Galveston Electric Co. v. City of Galveston, 258 U. S. 388, 395; State of Missouri ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of Missouri, 262 U. S. 276, 287; Georgia Ry. & Power Co. v. Railroad Commission of Georgia, 262 U. S. 625, 631; Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service Commission of West Virginia, 263 U. S. 679, 690. Clausen, with whom Messrs. J. W. Jamison and C. M. Bracelen were on the brief, for appellee.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United Railways & Elec. Co. of Baltimore v. West, 280 U.S. 234 (U.S. 1930)
    …s not inconsistent with this opinion. No. 64. Cross-appeal dismissed. Certiorari denied. See, for example, Galveston Elec. Co. v. Galveston, 258 U. S. 388, 400; Brush Elec. Co. v. Galveston, 262 U. S. 443; Fort Smith v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 270 U. S. 627, affirming per curiam Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Fort Smith, 294 Fed. 102, 108; Patterson v. Mobile Gas Co., 271 U. S. 131, affirming in part Mobile Gas Co. v. Patterson, 293 Fed. 208, 221; McCardle v. Indianapolis Water Co., 272 U. S. 400, 419 a…
  • Marsino v. Hogsett (D. Mass. 1930)
    …l was taken to the United States Supreme Court, which, on January 25, 1926, affirmed the action of the lower court upon the authority of Ponzi v. Fessenden, 258 U. S. 254, 42 S. Ct. 309, 310, 66 L. Ed. 607, 22 A. L. R. 879; Marsino v. United States, 270 U. S. 627, 46 S. Ct. 206, 70 L. Ed. 768. Marsino was never tried upon indictments Nos. 148 and 151. These indictments were nol. pros’d, and new indictments for the same offenses, namely, larceny and conspiracy, were returned on the 16th day of May, 1924. On…
  • Kramer v. Sheehy, 316 U.S. 646 (U.S. 1942)
    …al from the Supreme Court of Nevada. Per Curiam: The Court has examined all the federal questions raised by appellant. It finds that the attack upon the validity of the state statute raises no substantial federal question (Wolfgang v. California, 270 U. S. 627, and cases cited), and that none of the other questions presented warrant further review. The motion to dismiss is therefore granted, and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. The motion for leave to proceed further in…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw