THE PASCAGOULA NATIONAL BANK OF MOSS POINT AND PASCAGOULA, MISSISSIPPI
v.
THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ATLANTA ET AL.
THE PASCAGOULA NATIONAL BANK OF MOSS POINT AND PASCAGOULA, MISSISSIPPI
THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ATLANTA ET AL.
269 U.S. 537
Supreme Court of the United States (1925)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Transferred to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, upon-the authority of the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 3, 39 Stat. 727, and section 238 of the Judicial Code as amended by section 238 (a), act of September 14, 1922, c. 305, 42 Stat. 837; act of February 13, 1925, sec. 14; Heitler v. United States, 260 U. S. 438.
Mr. Alexander W. Smith, Jr., with whom Mr. Alexander W. Smith was on the brief, for appellant.
Messrs. Hollins N. Randolph, Montgomery Angelí, Newton D. Baker, Robert S. Parker and F. H. Watkins were on the brief, for appellees.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Moss J. Witt v. The United States, 681 F.2d 1144 (9th Cir. 1982)…ral Indian Law at 986. . For a description of the preparation and purposes of the rolls, see generally Woodward v. de Graffenried, 238 U.S. 284, 35 S.Ct. 764, 59 L.Ed. 1310 (1915); Rowe v. Sartain, 107 Okl. 199, 230 P. 919 (1924), appeal dismissed, 269 U.S. 537, 46 S.Ct. 106, 70 L.Ed. 400 (1925); Federal Indian Law at 999-1006. . 43 C.F.R. § 2531.1 provides: § 2531.1 Qualifications of applicants (a) General. An applicant for allotment under the fourth section of the act of February 8, 1887, as amended,…
Authorities Cited
- Heitler v. United States, 260 U.S. 438 (U.S. 1923)