CLARA SHOWALTER
v.
GEORGIA VALLIERE HAMPTON

U.S. | 1925-10-26
No. 72
269 U.S. 533 Supreme Court of the United States (1925) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448; sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrolton, 252 U. S. 1, 5-6.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Nat'l Contracting Co. v. United States, 270 U.S. 628 (U.S. 1926)
    …Per Curiam. Affirmed, without opinion, for lack of any substantial reason for appeal; Louisville Bedding Co. et al., v. United States, 269 U. S. 533.…
  • Showalter v. Hampton, 26 F.2d 777 (8th Cir. 1928)
    …s payment was executed. From the judgment of the Supreme Court of Oklahoma, the appellant sought and obtained a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the United States. The writ of error was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Showalter v. Hampton, 269 U. S. 533, 46 S. Ct. 100, 70 L. Ed. 398. III. The appellant contends that the county court of Ottawa county had no jurisdiction to hear and determine the question of the guardian’s liability for any amount charged to have been received by her on account of t…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw