HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY OF HARTFORD

v.

SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v. S. Pac. Co., 273 U.S. 207 (U.S. 1927)
  …chattels and lands of the stipulator for value.” The Hartford Indemnity Company, the stipulator, appealed from this decree, which the Circuit Court of Appeals of the Fifth Circuit affirmed. 3 Fed. (2nd) 923. We brought the case here by certiorari. 267 U. S. 590. The contention of the petitioner is, that it could become liable only in the event limitation of liability was granted,, and, as that relief was denied, the stipulation ceased to be effective; that upon a denial of a limitation of liability there…
• Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Nixon, 271 U.S. 218 (U.S. 1926)
  …y was based- upon the Employers’ Liability -Act of April 22, 1908, c. 149, § 1, 35 Stat. 65, the death having occurred in interstate commerce, a writ of certiorari was granted by this Court to review certain questions .of law that arose in the case. 267 U. S. 590. The deceased was an experienced section foreman upon the defendant’s road; One of his duties was to go over and examine the track and to keep it in proper repair. When inspecting the track he used a three wheeled velocipede that fitted the rails a…
• Gillenwaters v. Biddle, 18 F.2d 206 (8th Cir. 1927)
  …nts of the indictment constitute really but one transaction, and therefore that only a single sentence, within the limits of the statute, could be imposed. The first point is ruled against appellant under the authority of United States v. Daugherty, 267 U. S. 590, 45 S. Ct. 508, 69 L. Ed. 802. '[2] As to the second point: The ease was heard and ruled upon the face of the petition filed. -The indictment was made a part of that petition. The charges in the four counts are faultless and each describes an offen…