A. SCHRADER'S SON, INC.

v.

JAMES MARTIN CORPORATION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Martin-Trigona v. Shiff, 702 F.2d 380 (2d Cir. 1983)
  …tes ex rel. Paleais v. Moore, 294 F. 852, 855 (2d Cir.1923) (“only matter which can now be considered [on habeas corpus] is the matter of the lower court’s jurisdiction at the time it made the order adjudging the relator in contempt”), cert. denied, 264 U.S. 581, 44 S.Ct. 331, 68 L.Ed. 860 (1924); United States ex rel. Birnbaum v. Henkel, 185 F. 553, 554 (2d Cir.1911) (“Habeas corpus, however, does not review the regularity of the order, but only the validity of the commitment.”). [*388] Although habeas cor…
• Watkins v. Rives, 125 F.2d 33 (D.C. Cir. 1941)
  …213, 31 S.Ct. 143, 55 L.Ed. 184; United States ex rel. Birnbaum v. Henkel, C.C.S.D.N.Y., 185 F. 553, 554. Loubriel v. United States, 2 Cir., 9 F. 2d 807, 808; United States ex rel. Paleais v. Moore, 2 Cir., 294 F. 852, 854, 855, certiorari denied, 264 U.S. 581, 44 S.Ct. 331, 68 L.Ed. 860. D.C.Code (1929) tit. 29, § 154. Cf. In re Rosser, 8 Cir., 101 F. 562, 566; Jeffries v. Laurie, C.C., E.D. Mo., 27 F. 198; Ryan v. Kingsberry, 88 Ga. 361, 371-382, 14 S.E. 596, 599-602. Marfield v. McMurdy, 25 App.D.C.…