LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ET AL.

v.

SHREVEPORT RAILWAYS COMPANY

Citator

Cited By

• Steccone v. Morse-Starrett Prods. Co., 191 F.2d 197 (9th Cir. 1951)
  …8, 49-50, 20 S.Ct. 535, 44 L.Ed. 665; Smith v. Jackson, C.C.N.D.N.Y.1825, 22 Fed.Cas. No.,13,064, 1 Paine 453; In re Watts, 2 Cir., 1914, 214 F. 80; Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Cushman, 9 Cir., 1923, 292 F. 930, 932; petition for certiorari dismissed 263 U.S. 729, 44 S.Ct. 181, 68 L.Ed. 529; Schendel v. McGee, 8 Cir., 1924, 300 F. 273, 277; Cf. United States v. Fee, 9 Cir., 1943, 138 F. 2d 158. . See In re Grossmayer, supra, note 5, 177 [*200] U.S. at page 50, 20 S.Ct. at page 536; In re Watts, supra, note…
• Barnes v. United States, 678 F.2d 10 (3d Cir. 1982)
  …result of the defendant trying to deprive her of part of it. There is some hoary authority for the proposition that a portion of a single judgment at law cannot be affirmed. Kean v. National City Bank, 294 F. 214, 227 (6th Cir. 1923), cert. denied, 263 U.S. 729, 44 S.Ct. 179, 68 L.Ed. 528 (1924). What is absent in the discussion of the question is any reason for such a rule. If there is any, it may possibly have something to do with the role of the jury and the seventh amendment. At least with respect to…