A. ENGELHARD & SONS COMPANY

v.

LOUIS B. MACKENZIE

Citator

Cited By

• MacKenzie v. A. Engelhard & Sons Co., 266 U.S. 131 (U.S. 1924)
  …ef in equity should be limited to the amount of the debt, interest and costs in the other suit up to the time of sale, although the plaintiff’s right was absolute at law. 286 Fed. 813. Writs of certiorari were issued on the petitions of both sides. [262 U. S. 739.] It does not seem to us to need argument to establish that the sale to the plaintiff was effectual as against the parties to the suit. The decree confirming the sale was final and not appealed from. We believe the rule in Kentucky to be that purch…
• W. Union Tel. Co. v. Czizek, 264 U.S. 281 (U.S. 1924)
  …endant, but the judgment was reversed by the Circuit Court of Appeals, 272 Fed. 223, and at a second trial, in deference to the Circuit Court of Appeals, a judgment was entered for the plaintiff, which was affirmed. 286 Fed. 478. Certiorari granted. 262 U. S. 739. The plaintiff owned fifty shares of stock in the Idaho National Bank at Boise, Idaho. Miller, vice president of the bank, was buying the stock with a view to a merger. He talked with the plaintiff and told him that he would buy his stock and that…