MAGNUM IMPORT COMPANY, INC.
v.
FRANCOIS JOSEPH DE SPOTURNO COTY; MAX L. COHN, TRADING AS MACLEN IMPORT COMPANY, V. FRANCOIS JOSEPH DE SPOTURNO COTY; ARTHUR BAUM ET AL., TRADING AS BEAUTEX COMPANY, V. FRANCOIS JOSEPH DE SPOTURNO COTY; MAGNUM IMPORT COMPANY, INC. V. HOUBIGANT, INC., AND IVORY NOVELTIES TRADING COMPANY, INC. V. FRANCOIS JOSEPH DE SPOTURNO COTY
MAGNUM IMPORT COMPANY, INC.
FRANCOIS JOSEPH DE SPOTURNO COTY; MAX L. COHN, TRADING AS MACLEN IMPORT COMPANY, V. FRANCOIS JOSEPH DE SPOTURNO COTY; ARTHUR BAUM ET AL., TRADING AS BEAUTEX COMPANY, V. FRANCOIS JOSEPH DE SPOTURNO COTY; MAGNUM IMPORT COMPANY, INC. V. HOUBIGANT, INC., AND IVORY NOVELTIES TRADING COMPANY, INC. V. FRANCOIS JOSEPH DE SPOTURNO COTY
262 U.S. 738
Supreme Court of the United States (1923)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Johnston, 268 U.S. 220 (U.S. 1925)
-
United States v. Gulf Ref. Co., 268 U.S. 542 (U.S. 1925)…by the Act of June 29, 1906, § 2, c. 3591, 34 Stat. 584, 587. The Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the judgment-and remanded the case with directions .to grant a new trial. 284 Fed. 90. This Court granted a writ of certiorari. § 240, Judicial Code. 262 U. S. 738. Defendant, insisting that this Court is without jurisdiction, made a motion to dismiss the writ. The determination of the matter was postponed to the hearing on the merits. In United States v. Dickinson, (1909) 213 U. S. 92, it was held that certi…