GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
v.
MCCAULL-DINSMORE COMPANY
GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
MCCAULL-DINSMORE COMPANY
261 U.S. 610
Supreme Court of the United States (1923)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Farmers & Merchs. Bank of Monroe v. Fed. Reserve Bank of Richmond, 262 U.S. 649 (U.S. 1923)…one of them was a member of the federal reserve system or was affiliated with it. The trial court granted a perpetual [*653] injunction. The Supreme Court of the State reversed the decree, 183 N. Car. 546; and the case is here on writ of certiorari, 261 U. S. 610. Defendant admits that, if the North Carolina statute is constitutional, plaintiffs are entitled to an injunction. To understand the occasion for the statute, its operation and its effect, the applicable banking practice must be considered.1 Par cl…
-
United States v. Hardaway Contracting Co. (E.D.S.C. 1924)…bsolutely final and binding, and that a petition for rehearing was allowed. But these points were called expressly to the attention of the court in the petition for rehearing. That ease and the similar ease of U. S. v. Northeastern Construction Co., 261 U. S. 610, 43 S. Ct. 518, 67 L. Ed. 825, were re-argued, and the court in a per euriam opinion stated: “Upon rehearing, the former, opinions, as well as the judgments heretofore rendered, are affirmed.” It thus appears that the court took pains to say that, n…