MARIE E. BERNS AND HER HUSBAND, JOHN H. BERNS, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
EDWARD J. HARRISON OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, APPELLEE
MARIE E. BERNS AND HER HUSBAND, JOHN H. BERNS, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
EDWARD J. HARRISON OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, APPELLEE
100 Fla. 192
Florida Supreme Court (1930)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for .the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and' the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the court that the said decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Berns v. Harrison, 100 Fla. 1105 (Fla. 1930)…la. 108, 76 So. R. 679. There being no sufficient ground alleged authorizing a dismissal of the appeal the motion is therefore denied. The appeal from the “deficiency decree” has been heretofore affirmed at this term; see Berns et al. v. Harrison, 100 Fla. 192, 129 So. R. 591. [*1109] The final decree appealed from is reversed in so far as it awards attorney’s fees to the complainant. In all other respects the final decree is affirmed. The cause is remanded with directions to grant leave to the parties co…