UNITED STATES
v.
WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY

U.S. | 1922-10-23
No. 47
260 U.S. 754 Supreme Court of the United States (1922) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 (U.S. 1952)
    …. Waterman Steamship Corp., 333 U. S. 103, and Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 U. S. 81. But see, Jecker v. Montgomery, 13 How. 498, 515; United States v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 272 F. 311; aff’d, 272 F. 893; rev’d on consent of the parties, 260 U. S. 754; United States Harness Co. v. Graham, 288 F. 929. Since the Constitution implies that the writ of habeas corpus may be suspended in certain circumstances but does not say by whom, President Lincoln asserted and maintained it as an executive functio…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw