GOLDIE A. SKOLNIK
v.
UNITED STATES
GOLDIE A. SKOLNIK
UNITED STATES
260 U.S. 746
Supreme Court of the United States (1923)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Merrell Soule Co. v. Powdered Milk Co. of Am., 7 F.2d 297 (2d Cir. 1925)…der was substantially to consider the various estimates or opinions of persons more or less qualified to express them and arrive at a result, as would a jury. More recently, in K. W. Ignition Co. v. Te Temco (C. C. A.) 283 F. 873, certiorari denied 260 U. S. 746, 43 S. Ct. 247, 67 L. Ed. 493, there was no opinion evidence (page 878) as to the rate of reasonable royalty; yet the court proceeded to assess damages on the basis of a royalty estimated as appropriate to the manufacturing and selling profits prove…
-
Ellerbrake v. United States, 134 F.2d 683 (7th Cir. 1943)…e court was thereafter without power to impose sentences running consecutively in the two remaining cases. A conspiracy is a distinct offense from the substantive crime which is its object. Ader v. United States, 7 Cir., 284 F. 13, certiorari denied 260 U.S. 746, 43 S.Ct. 247, 67 L.Ed. 493; Heike v. United States, 227 U.S. 131, 33 S.Ct. 226, 57 L.Ed. 450. Consequently substantive offenses are not merged in the charge of conspiracy and sentence upon a conviction of conspiracy in no way bars punishment for th…
-
United States v. Unger, 295 F.2d 889 (7th Cir. 1961)