AMERICAN MERCHANT MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK

v.

LIBERTY SAND & GRAVEL COMPANY, INC.

Citator

Cited By

• Leather's Best, Inc. v. S.S. Mormaclynx, 451 F.2d 800 (2d Cir. 1971)
  …nd Procedure § 1465, at 348-49 (1971). Indeed, there was substantial authority to the effect that the third-party claim had to come within the admiralty jurisdiction. See Aktieselskabet Fido v. Lloyd Braziliero, 283 F. 62, 72 (2 Cir.), cert, denied, 260 U.S. 737, 43 S.Ct. 97, 67 L.Ed. 489 (1922) ; Rudy-Patrick Seed Co. v. Kokusai, 1 F.Supp. 266 (S.D.N.Y. 1932). But of. Soderberg v. Atlantic Lighterage Corp., 19 F. 2d 286, 287 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 275 U.S. 542, 48 S.Ct. 37, 72 L.Ed. 416 (1927). With merge…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Farwest Steel Corp. v. Barge Sea-Span 241, 769 F.2d 620 (9th Cir. 1985)
  …n if we find that Far-west did not have a maritime lien on the Barge, the underlying contractual claim will support the district court’s admiralty jurisdiction. See Aktieselskabet Fido v. Lloyd Braziliero, 283 Fed. 62, 73-74 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 260 U.S. 737-38, 43 S.Ct. 97, 67 L.Ed. 489 (1922); Reichert Towing Line, Inc. v. Long Island Machine & Marine Constr. Co., 287 Fed. 269 (E.D.N.Y. 1922) (subcontractor providing supplies directly to vessel would “no doubt” have a maritime contract); 1 Benedict on…
• Peralta Shipping Corp. v. Smith & Johnson (Shipping) Corp., 739 F.2d 798 (2d Cir. 1984)
  …Henry, 86 F. 656, 657 (2d Cir.1898), or a charter party, Christman v. Maristella Compania Naviera, 349 F.Supp. 845, 848 (S.D.N.Y.), affd, 468 F. 2d 620 (2d Cir.1972); Aktieselskabet Fido v. The Lloyd Braziliero, 283 F. 2d 62 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 260 U.S. 737, 43 S.Ct. 97, 67 L.Ed. 489 (1922); The Thames, supra, have been cognizable in admiralty. Nor has admiralty jurisdiction extended to general agency contracts that call for “husbanding” a vessel, i.e., arranging for performance of a variety of servic…