BEER, SONDHEIMER & COMPANY, INC.,

v.

AMERICAN & CUBAN STEAMSHIP LINE, INC.

Citator

Cited By

• Premier Dental Prods. Co. v. Darby Dental Supply Co., Inc., 794 F.2d 850 (3d Cir. 1986)
  …, 73-74 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct., 1265, 89 L.Ed.2d 574 (1986) (assignment subject to termination upon certain conditions); Andrew Jergens Co. v. Woodbury, Inc., 273 F. 952 (D.Del.1921), aff'd 279 F. 1016 (3d Cir.) cert. denied 260 U.S. 728, 43 S.Ct. 92, 67 L.Ed. 484 (1922) (rights reserved in assignor); Model Rectifier, 220 U.S.P.Q. at 510-11 (same); In Re George Ball, 153 U.S.P.Q. at 426-28 (assignment terminable on six months notice); 1 McCarthy, supra, at §§ 16.17, 18.1; see also R…
• Wally Gray & Md. Cas. Co. v. Travelers Indem. Co., 280 F.2d 549 (9th Cir. 1960)
  …nstruction to the effect that an interpretation ought not to be.adopted which would render the document meaningless. See Andrew Jergens Co. v. Woodbury, Inc., D.C.Del.1921, 273 F. 952, 959, affirmed 3 Cir., 1922, 279 F. 1016, certiorari denied 1922, 260 U.S. 728, 43 S.Ct. 92, 67 L.Ed. 484; Peavy-Byrnes Lumber Co., Inc. v. Long-Bell Lumber Co., D.C.W.D.La.1944, 55 F.Supp. 654, 659, affirmed 5 Cir., 1945, 150 F. 2d 49; Thomas Hoist Co. v. William J. Newman Co., 1937, 365 Ill. 160, 6 N.E. 2d 171, 174. Since p…
• Andrew Jergens Co. v. Bonded Prods. Corp. (E.D.N.Y. 1926)
  …ed. So much, then, for the above decision and its effect on the issues now presented before me. We now come to the second decision, which is Andrew Jergens Co. v. Woodbury, Inc. (D. C.) 273 F. 952, affirmed (C. C. A.) 279 F. 1016, certiorari denied 260 U. S. 728, 43 S. Ct. 92, 67 L. Ed. 484. This decision represents the determination of a suit brought by plaintiff against William A. Woodbury Distributors,. Inc., Woodbury, Inc., and Woodbury System, Ine. It indicates that, after the death of John H. Wood-bu…