THOMSON SPOT WELDER COMPANY
v.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY

U.S. | 1922-11-13
No. 589
260 U.S. 718 Supreme Court of the United States (1922) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Thomson Spot Welder Co. v. Ford Motor Co., 265 U.S. 445 (U.S. 1924)
    …n account of a conflict with a prior decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, in Thomson Electric Welding Co. v. Barney & Berry, 227 Fed. 428, in which the patent had been held to be valid, this writ of certiorari was granted. 260 U. S. 718. In the present case both the District Court and the Circuit Court of Appeals have held that Harmatta’s improvement involved merely the exercise of mechanical skill and not invention. The question whether an improvement requires mere mechanical ski…
  • Lynch v. Tilden Produce Co., 265 U.S. 315 (U.S. 1924)
    …the trial, a verdict was directed in favor of the company, and judgment was entered for the amount paid with interest. The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment. 282 Fed. 64. The case is here on certiorari under § 240 of the Judicial Code. 260 U. S. 718. The question for decision is whether the butter was adulterated within the meaning of the Act of May 9,1902, c. 784, 32 Stat. 193. In 1918, the company manufactured in its creamery at Saint Paul, 350 tubs of butter, which it shipped to Chicago. A…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw