BORDER NATIONAL BANK OF EAGLE PASS, TEXAS,
v.
AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
BORDER NATIONAL BANK OF EAGLE PASS, TEXAS,
AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
260 U.S. 701
Supreme Court of the United States (1922)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U. S. 526, 530; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; St. Anthony. Church v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 237 U. S. 575, 577. The petition for a writ of certiorari herein is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Sischo, 262 U.S. 165 (U.S. 1923)
-
Barclays Bank D. C. O. v. Mercantile Nat'l Bank, 481 F.2d 1224 (5th Cir. 1973)…7, 134 S.E. 2d 777 (1964). . X Halls, The Uniform Commercial Code in Minnesota: Article 5 — Letters of Credit, 50 Minn.L.Rev. 453, 454 at n. 3 (1966). . See Border National Bank v. American National Bank, 282 F. 73, 77 (5th Cir., 1922), cert. den. 260 U.S. 701, 43 S.Ct. 96, 67 L.Ed. 471. As one commentator lias noted: “A letter of credit always serves as a guaranty. This does not mean that it is a guaranty. A letter of credit is an identical twin to a guaranty, but tlie fact that the two things look alik…
-
Davies v. Lahann, 145 F.2d 656 (10th Cir. 1944)…d independent undertaking binding the guarantor apart from the primary obligation. Bank of Plant City v. Canal-Commercial Trust & Savings Bank, 5 Cir., 270 F. 477; Border National Bank v. American National Bank, 5 Cir., 282 F. 73, certiorari denied, 260 U.S. 701, 732, 43 S.Ct. 96, 67 L.Ed. 471. But the bond on which recovery was had in the court below was not an independent undertaking of that kind, separate and apart from the primary obligation. Instead, it was essentially a collateral engagement condition…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U.S. 561 (U.S. 1912)
- Hull v. Burr, 234 U.S. 712 (U.S. 1914)
- Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U.S. 526 (U.S. 1903)
- Roman Catholic Church of ST. Anthony of Padua v. The Pa. R.R. Co., 237 U.S. 575 (U.S. 1915)