JOHN CONNORS
v.
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS; EDWARD O'DONNELL V. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS; LEONARD BANKS ET AL. V. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS; FRANK BENDER V. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS; JOHN BOONE V. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS; WILLIAM TAGLIA V. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS; ABE SCHAFFNER V. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS; AND GEORGE MORAN V. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

U.S. | 1922-10-09
Nos. 6; No. 7; No. 8; No. 9; No. 10; No. 11; No. 23; No. 57
260 U.S. 695 Supreme Court of the United States (1922) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed upon the authority of Dreyer v. Illinois, 187 U. S. 71; Ughbanks v. Armstrong, 208 U. S. 481, 485.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States ex rel. Palmer v. Ragen, 159 F.2d 356 (7th Cir. 1947)
    …mum term fixed by law. The parole law * * * does not, by any of its provisions, violate any right of a citizen guaranteed by the federal or state Constitution.” This decision was affirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States without opinion in 260 U.S. 695, 43 S.Ct. 11, 67 L.Ed. 468, upon the authority of Dreyer v. Illinois, 187 U.S. 71, 23 S.Ct. 28, 47 L.Ed. 79 and Ughbanks v. Armstrong, 208 U.S. 481, 28 S.Ct. 372, 52 L.Ed. 582. In the Dreyer case the Illinois indeterminate sentence act was before th…
  • Uryga v. Ragen, 181 F.2d 660 (7th Cir. 1950)
    …od time, and dismissed the suit. Under the applicable Illinois statutes, Ill.Rev.Stat.1949, c. 38, § 801 et seq., an indeterminate sentence is a certain definite sentence for the maximum term. People v. Connors, 291 Ill. 614, 126 N.E. 595, affirmed 260 U.S. 695, 43 S.Ct. 11, 67 L.Ed. 468. This was our decision, in view of the Illinois authorities, in United States ex rel. Palmer v. Ragen, 7 Cir., 159 F. 2d 356, certiorari denied 331 U.S. 823, 67 S.Ct. 1311, 91 L.Ed. 1839. This maximum term of punishment…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw