ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION OF FLORIDA, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,

v.

G. W. STEWART, JR., ET AL., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Brookins v. State, 174 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)
  …of prejudicial harm a preliminary hearing is not an essential step in a criminal proceeding [see: Baugus v. State, Fla.1962, 141 So. 2d 264, cert. den 83 S.Ct. 153, 371 U.S. 879, 9 L.Ed.2d 117; Wooten v. State, supra; Hoffman v. State, Fla.App.1964, 169 So. 2d 38], lack of counsel at a preliminary hearing does not constitute a denial of due process of law. Webster v. State, Fla.App. 1963, 156 So. 2d 890; Sam v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So. 2d 258. As to the appellant’s second allegation, the appellant has f…
• Gibson v. State, 173 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)
  …e v. State, 1902, 44 Fla. 148, 32 So. 784; Di Bona v. State, Fla.App. 1960, 121 So. 2d 192. Thus, the denial of a preliminary hearing cannot deprive a defendant of due process of law and the substance of a fair trial. Hoffman v. State, Fla.App.1964, 169 So. 2d 38; Wooten v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So. 2d 305. This is particularly true in the absence of a showing that prejudice to the appellant resulted from his failure to have a preliminary hearing. See Wooten v. State, supra. It is therefore the opinion o…
• Douzier Shannon v. State, 172 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)
  …ge did not commit error, and we affirm. A preliminary hearing was not essential to due process and a fair trial. No prejudice was shown to have resulted from its absence. Wooten v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So. 2d 305; Hoffman v. State, Fla.App.1964, 169 So. 2d 38. The statutory provisions for furnishing a copy of an indictment or information contemplate an application therefor. §§ 906.28 and 940.04, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. The trial judge correctly viewed as insufficient an allegation that copies were not supplied…