CLARENCE H. VENNER, ETC.,

v.

NEW YORK CENTRAL & HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Evans, 572 F.2d 455 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …it is a matter of law for the court’s [*471] determination. United States v. Lanni, 466 F. 2d 1102, 1110 (3d Cir. 1972); Terry v. United States, 131 F. 2d 40, 44 (8th Cir. 1942); Thompson v. United States, 256 F. 616, 619-20 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 249 U.S. 617, 39 S.Ct. 391, 63 L.Ed. 804 (1919). On the other hand, it is an essential element of a violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 641 that the government suffer some actual property loss. See United States v. Collins, 464 F. 2d 1163, 1165 (9th Cir. 1972). Although…
• Steckler v. Pennroad Corp., 136 F.2d 197 (3d Cir. 1943)
  …77, 70 N.Y. 220. Boardman v. Lake Shore & M. S. Ry. Co., 1881, 84 N.Y. 157, 184. Venner v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co., 2d Dept. 1917, 177 App.Div. 296, 164 N.Y.S. 626, 653, 659, affirmed 1919, 226 N.Y. 583, 123 N.E. 893, certiorari denied 1919, 249 U.S. 617, 39 S.Ct. 391, 63 L.Ed. 803. See Foley, supra note 4, at pp. 519, 520. Pollitz v. Wabash R. Co., 1st Dept. 1912, 150 App.Div. 709. 135 N.Y.S. 785; Pollitz v. Wabash R. Co., 1st Dept. 1915, 167 App.Div. 669, 152 N.Y.S. 803. Venner v. New York Cent…
• Atwater v. Wheeling & L. E. RY. Co., 56 F.2d 720 (6th Cir. 1932)
  …tion that where a sovereignty has spoken through a commission, its action is final. Venner v. New York Central & H. R. Co., 177 App. Div. 296, 343, 164 N. Y. S. 626, 657, affirmed without report 226 N. Y. 583, 123 N. E. 893, [*725] certiorari denied 249 U. S. 617, 39 S. Ct. 391, 63 L. Ed. 803.2 Even if the action of the commission was not final and is subject to change (a question which we need not decide), the appellant is not entitled to enjoin the execution of the user contract. No action on the part of,…