WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY

v.

NASHVILLE, CHATTANOOGA & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Meyer, 113 F.2d 387 (7th Cir. 1940)
  …y of Bloomington, 246 Ill.App. 334, 341; Rich v. City of Chicago, 187 Ill. 396, 398, 58 N.E. 306; Vane v. City of Evanston, 150 Ill. 616, 622, 37 N.E. 901; Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 6 Cir., 249 F. 385, certiorari denied 248 U.S. 576, 39 S.Ct. 18, 63 L.Ed. 428, 429; Murhard Estate Co. v. Portland & Seattle R. Co., 9 Cir., 163 F. 194; Forbes v. United States, 5 Cir., 268 F. 273. Defendants complain that, although the petition recited that there had been an unsuccessful attempt b…
• Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Reconstr. Fin. Corp., 240 F.2d 444 (9th Cir. 1957)
  …F. 385, 402, a condemnation case, the Court said: “Finding the amount of compensation is another term for assessing damages, and this always has been a recognized function of a jury.” In that case, certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court, 1918, 248 U.S. 576-577, 39 S.Ct. 18, 63 L.Ed. 428, 429. Similarly, in Filbin Corporation v. United States, D.C.S.C.1920, 266 F. 911, 916, the Court used the following language: “It would seem absurd to say that, if the United States sued a man on a contract or for a…