J. W. FERGUSON ET AL.
v.
BABCOCK LUMBER & LAND COMPANY

U.S. | 1918-12-16
No. 630
248 U.S. 540 Supreme Court of the United States (1918) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 128 of the Judicial Code; Stevenson v. Fain, 195 U. S. 165; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; St. Anthony Church v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 237 U. S. 575, 577; Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co. v. Yurkonis, 238 U. S. 439, 444.

See post, 570.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Frohwerk v. United States, 249 U.S. 204 (U.S. 1919)
    …rohwerk applied to this Court for leave to file a petition.for a writ of mandainus requiring the judge to sign a proper bill of exceptions, but a case was not stated that would warrant the issuing of the writ and leave was denied. Ex parte Frohwerk, 248 U. S. 540. The absence of a bill of exceptions and the suggestions in the application for mandamus have caused us to consider the cáse with more anxiety than if it presented only the constitutional question which was the theme of the principal argument here.…
  • United States v. Houston Belt & Terminal Ry. Co., 210 F.2d 421 (5th Cir. 1954)
    …Stock Yard & Transit Co. v. United States, 308 U.S. 213, 220, 60 S.Ct. 193, 84 L. Ed. 198; Oregon Short Line R. Co. v. United States, 9 Cir., 234 F. 584, 586. . Baltimore & O. S. W. R. Co. v. United States, 6 Cir., 242 F. 420, 424, error dismissed 248 U.S. 540, 39 S.Ct. 133, 63 L.Ed. 411; Cf. United States v. Trinity & B. V. Ry. Co., supra. . United States v. Atcheson, Topeka & S. F. Ry. Co., 9 Cir., 156 F. 2d 457.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw