EDMUND PENFOLD ET AL., EXECUTORS, ETC., ET AL.
v.
EUGENE M. TRAVIS, AS COMPTROLLER OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
EDMUND PENFOLD ET AL., EXECUTORS, ETC., ET AL.
EUGENE M. TRAVIS, AS COMPTROLLER OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
248 U.S. 537
Supreme Court of the United States (1918)
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257; Municipal Securities Corporation v. Kansas City, 246 U. S. 63, 69; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300. (2) Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U.S. 89 (U.S. 1905)
- Consol. Tpk. Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Ry. Co., 228 U.S. 596 (U.S. 1913)
- Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U.S. 71 (U.S. 1909)
- Brolan v. United States, 236 U.S. 216 (U.S. 1915)
- Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U.S. 255 (U.S. 1918)
- Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. N. Realty Co., 244 U.S. 300 (U.S. 1917)
- Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Hanley, 205 U.S. 225 (U.S. 1907)
- Mun. Sec. Corp. v. Kan. City, 246 U.S. 63 (U.S. 1918)