ZANESVILLE & WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY
v.
CHARLES E. WILLIAMS, ADMINISTRATOR, ETC.

U.S. | 1918-11-04
No. 457
248 U.S. 533 Supreme Court of the United States (1918) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237, Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, 39 Stat. 726. Petition for writ of certiorari denied.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Anglo-Chilean Nitrate Sales Corp. v. Alabama, 288 U.S. 218 (U.S. 1933)
    …ike argument directed to statutes phrased in the same way has been urged upon this court, only to be rejected as unsound. Home Life Ins. Co. v. New York, supra; St. Louis, S. W. Ry. Co. v. Arkansas, [*233] supra; Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Alabama, 248 U. S. 533; 201 Ala. 317; 78 So. 93 (involving a statute of Alabama similar to this one); Kansas City, M. & B. R. Co. v. Stiles, 242 U. S. 111, affirming 182 Ala. 138; 62 So. 734; Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., 220 U. S. 107, 145, 146. Thus, in Home Life Ins. Co.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw