ALASKA PACIFIC STEAMSHIP COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.

U.S. | 1918-03-04
Nos. 474 and 475
246 U.S. 648 Supreme Court of the United States (1918) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Stipulations of counsel to the effect that the same judgments may be entered in' these cases as in case No. 476, (next supra) having been filed, the judgments are therefore reversed and the eases remanded for further proceedings.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Ercoli v. United States (D.D.C. 1942)
    …. 304, 308, 313, 20 L.Ed. 481 ; United States v. Vigorito, 2 Cir., 67 F. 2d 329, certiorari denied, 290 U.S. 705, 54 S.Ct. 373, 78 L.Ed. 606. See United States v. Knoell, D.C.E.D.Pa., 230 F. 509, 512, affirmed, 3 Cir., 239 F. 16, 21, error dismissed 246 U.S. 648, 38 SUt. 316, 62 L. Ed. 920. 9 Wigmore, Evidence, 3d Ed. 1940, §§ 2588, 2590; Smith v. United States, 61 App.D.C. 344, 62 F. 2d 1061 ; Leyer v. United States, 2 Cir., 183 F. 102, 104. D.C.Code (1940) § 40 — 606, 49 Stat. 385: “Any person who, by t…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw