HARRY SUSMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PITTSBURGH

U.S. | 1918-01-14
No. 108
245 U.S. 636 Supreme Court of the United States (1918) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Witherspoon v. Duncan, 4 Wall. 210, 217; Fallbrook Irrigation District v. Bradley, 164 U. S. 112; Soliah v. Heskin, 222 U. S. 522; (2) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk, etc., Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. 652, 658; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Stadelman v. Miner, 246 U.S. 544 (U.S. 1918)
  • Phipps v. Sch. Dist. of Pittsburgh, 111 F.2d 393 (3d Cir. 1940)
    …lodner, et al., 320 Pa. 421, 184 A. 37; Kelley et al. v. Kalodner et al., 320 Pa. 180, 181 A. 598; Dougherty, Trustee, v. Philadelphia et al., 314 Pa. 298, 301, 171 A. 583; Susman v. Board of Public Education, D.C., 228 F. 217, 220, appeal dismissed 245 U.S. 636, 38 S.Ct. 190, 62 L.Ed. 524; Provident Life & Trust Co. v. Durham, 212 Pa. 68, 61 A. 636; St. Mary’s Gas Co. v. Elk County et al., 168 Pa. 401, 31 A. 1077; Robert Arthur School District et al., v. Polk Borough School District et al., 164 Pa. 410, 30…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw