JOSEPH FRIEDMAN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Gollin, 166 F.2d 123 (3d Cir. 1948)
  …at the carriage was by the owner of the property did not put the property outside of the protection of the statute. Friedman v. United States, 1 Cir., 233 F. 429; certiorari denied 244 U.S. 657, 37 S.Ct. 744, 61 L.Ed. 1375; motion to dismiss granted 244 U.S. 643, 37 S.Ct. 650, 61 L.Ed. 1367; Marifian v. United States, 8 Cir., 82 F. 2d 628; certiorari denied 298 U.S. 686, 56 S.Ct. 956, 80 L.Ed. 1406. With the simple fact of the brewery’s role as shipper and carrier understood and accepted as it must be under…
• Marifian v. United States, 82 F.2d 628 (8th Cir. 1936)
  …ut the property outside of the protection of the statute. Friedman v. United States, 233 F. 429 (C.C.A.1), certiorari denied Freedman v. United States, 244 U.S. 657, 37 S.Ct. 744, 61 L.Ed. 1375, and writ of error dismissed Friedman v. United States, 244 U.S. 643, 37 S.Ct. 650, 61 L.Ed. 1367. The statute afforded protection to the property on this truck in its journey from East St. Louis, Ill., to St: Louis, Mo., whether that journey be regarded as the final movement in the original shipment from Richmond, V…
• Knoell v. United States, 246 U.S. 648 (U.S. 1918)
  …Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Macfadden v. United States, 213 U. S. 288; Friedman v. United States, 244 U. S. 643.…

Authorities Cited

• MacFadden v. United States, 213 U.S. 288 (U.S. 1909)