THE HAWGOOD & AVERY TRANSIT COMPANY, PETITIONER,

v.

THE MEAFORD TRANSPORTATION COMPANY; AND THE HAWGOOD & AVERY TRANSIT COMPANY, PETITIONER, V. ELLEN WILLIAMS, ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC.

Citator

Cited By

• Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik AG v. Murata Mach., Ltd., 731 F.2d 831 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
  …see also B.F. Sturtevant Co. v. Mass. Hair & Felt Co., 124 F. 2d 95, 51 USPQ 420 (1st Cir.1941), cert. denied, 315 U.S. 823, 62 S.Ct. 917, 86 L.Ed. 219 (1942); Burke Elec. Co. v. Independent Pneumatic Tool Co., 234 F. 93 (2d Cir.1916), cert. denied, 241 U.S. 682, 36 S.Ct. 728, 60 L.Ed. 1234 (1916); McCreery Eng. Co. v. Mass. Fan Co., 195 F. 498 (1st Cir.1912). . New Guidelines for Applying the On Sale Bar to Patentability, 24 Stan.L.Rev. 730, 744 (1972). . South Corp. v. United States, 690 F. 2d 1368, 137…
• Timely Prods. Corp. v. Arron, 523 F.2d 288 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …sale” defenses in a single section seems a frail anchor for what became such an extensive line, but four years later, this Court, in its per curiam decision in Burke Electric Co. v. Independent Pneumatic Tool Co., 234 F. 93 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 241 U.S. 682, 36 S.Ct. 728, 60 L.Ed. 1234 (1916), was likewise persuaded by it, stating: “The proofs in this case show that the patented motors were ordered two years and a few days before the application for the patent was filed, but were not delivered and cou…
• Dart Indus., Inc. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., 489 F.2d 1359 (7th Cir. 1973)
  …2d 129, 134 (7th Cir. 1966). The district court’s conclusion of law No. 36 was incomplete because it omitted any reference to the inventor’s burden. . See Burke Electric Co. v. Independent Pneumatic Tool Co., 234 F. 93 (2d Cir. 1916), cert. denied 241 U.S. 682, 36 S.Ct. 728, 60 L.Ed. 1234; McCreery Engineering Co. v. Massachusetts Pan Co., 195 F. 498, 501 (1st Cir. 1912); B. F. Sturtevant Co. v. Massachusetts Hair & Felt Co., 124 F. 2d 95, 97 (1st Cir. 1941). . “Until the inventive idea is successfully r…