CHARLES A. THATCHER, APPELLANT AND PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,

v.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. Mitchell, 245 U.S. 229 (U.S. 1917)
  …issed, as the jurisdiction of [*265] the Circuit (District) Court was rested wholly upon diversity of citizenship, plaintiff being a corporation organized under the laws of West Virginia and all the defendants citizens and residents of other States. 241 U. S. 644. A writ of certiorari was granted, however, March 13, 1916. The case was argued at that term and a reargument was ordered. The District Court held that the United Mine Workers of America with its subordinate branches constitutes an unlawful organiz…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Silkworth v. United States, 10 F.2d 711 (2d Cir. 1926)
  …ation and indispensable to its execution. Acts and statements of one party, carrying into effect a purpose upon which he is engaged in common with others, are admissible against his fellow 'collaborators. [*720] Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. Mitchell, 241 U. S. 644, 36 S. Ct. 450, 60 L. Ed. 1218; Hamburg-American Steam Packet Co. v. United States, 250 F. 747, 163 C. C. A. 79; Pennacchio v. United States (C. C. A.) 263 F. 66. [13,14] There is little doubt that the firm •and its clerk, Romm, were obviously and…
• Eagle Glass & Mfg. Co. v. Rowe, 245 U.S. 275 (U.S. 1917)
  …etition for writ of certiorari. The decision upon the petition was postponed. It is clear that the appeal must be dismissed, as the jurisdiction of the District Court rests wholly upon diversity of citizenship. Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. Mitchell, 241 U. S. 644. The petition for certiorari having been granted, the decree should, in my opinion, be affirmed for the reasons stated by the Circuit Court of Appeals and in the dissent in Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. Mitchell, ante, 229. Mr. Justices Holmes and Mr…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Ex parte Bradley, 7 Wall. 364 (U.S. 1868)
• Ex parte Robinson, 19 Wall. 513 (U.S. 1873)