THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS EX REL. JOHN B. GASKILL, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
FOREST HOME CEMETERY COMPANY OF CHICAGO ET AL.

U.S. | 1915-03-08
No. 168
238 U.S. 606 Supreme Court of the United States (1915) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Yazoo & Miss. R. R. v. Brewer, 231 U. S. 245, 249; Holden Land Co. v. Interstate Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536, 541; (2) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consol. Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 599-600; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. 652, 658.

Mr: George W. Wilbur for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Walter D. Herrick for the defendants in error.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • La. & Ark. Ry. Co. v. Pratt, 142 F.2d 847 (5th Cir. 1944)
    …. In re Second Employers’ Liability Cases (Mondou v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co.), 223 U.S. 1, 32 S.Ct. 169, 56 L.Ed. 327, 38 L.R.A.,N.S., 44; Wabash Ry. Co. v. Hayes, 234 U.S. 86, 34 S.Ct. 729, 58 L.Ed. 1226; Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Thornton, 238 U.S. 606, 38 S.Ct. 96, 62 L.Ed. 299; Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Kenney, 240 U.S. 489, 36 S.Ct. 458, 60 L.Ed. 762; Chicago, M. & St. Paul Ry. Co. v. Coogan, 271 U.S. 472, 46 S.Ct. 564, 70 L.Ed. 1041. Burrows v. Lownsdale, 9 Cir., 133 F. 250; The Argo, 9 Ci…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw