W. SCHNEIDER WHOLESALE WINE & LIQUOR COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
AUGUST DIEDERICH

U.S. | 1914-03-16
No. 243
232 U.S. 720 Supreme Court of the United States (1914) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam

Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Street & Smith v. Atlas Mfg. Co., decided, this term, 231 U. S. 348.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Thompson v. The City of St. Louis, 239 U.S. 636 (U.S. 1916)
    …Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission, 226 U. S. 99; United States v. Beatty, 232 U. S. 463; Pons v. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley R. R., 232 U. S. 720.…
  • N. Tr. Co. v. The People of the State of Ill., 234 U.S. 748 (U.S. 1914)
    …of jurisdiction upon the authority of Hazeltine v. Central Bank of Missouri, 183 U. S. 130; M. & K. Interurban Railway Co. v. Olathe, 222 U. S. 185; Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission, 226 U. S. 99; Pons v. Yazoo & Miss. Valley R. R. Co., 232 U. S. 720.…
  • The United States Fid. & Guar. Co. of Baltimore v. Poetker, 235 U.S. 683 (U.S. 1914)
    …Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of [*684] (1) First National Bank v. Estherville, 215 U. S. 341, 346; Rogers v. Clark Iron Co., 217 U. S. 589; May v. Illinois, 232 U. S. 720; (2) McCorquodale v. Texas, 211 U. S. 432, 437; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 326, 334; City of Lewiston v. Chamberlain, 234 U. S. 751. Mr. Charles Martindale for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Frank S. Roby and Mr.-Ward H. Wat…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw