THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
PHILADELPHIA, BALTIMORE & WASHINGTON RAILROAD COMPANY

U.S. | 1914-01-26
No. 174
232 U.S. 716 Supreme Court of the United States (1914) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam

Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. American Security & Trust Company v. Commissioners of the District of Columbia, 224 U. S. 491. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Washington v. Downey, 236 U.S. 190 (U.S. 1915)
    …include “laws of the United States local in their application to the, District of Columbia.” McGowan v. Parish, 228 U. S. 312, 317; American Security Co. v. Dist. of Columbia, 224 U. S. 491; District of Columbia v. Philadelphia, Balt. & Wash. R. R., 232 U S. 716. The law here involved, as we have said, is .the Employers’ Liability Act of 1906. Undoubtedly that law as enacted was in form one of general application, but it was held to be unconstitutional as such a law in The Employers’ Liability Cases, 207 U…
  • Coates v. The Dist. of Columbia, 239 U.S. 636 (U.S. 1916)
    …Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of American Security & Trust Co. v. District of Columbia, 224 U. S. 491; District of Columbia v. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington R. R., 232 U. S. 716; Washington & Mt. Vernon Ry. v. Downey, 236 U. S. 190.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw