CENTRAL PARK, NORTH & EAST RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, PETITIONER,
v.
THE FARMERS' LOAN & TRUST COMPANY, TRUSTEE, ET AL.

U.S. | 1912-06-10
No. 1146
225 U.S. 712 Supreme Court of the United States (1912) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Campbell River Timber Co. v. Vierhus, 86 F.2d 673 (9th Cir. 1936)
    …ion, we find respectable authority, including federal decisions, holding that the terms “extension” and “renewal” may be used interchangeably. In Farmers’ Loan & T. Co. v. Central Park, N. & E. R. R. Co. (C.C.A.2) 193 F. 963, 965, certiorari denied 225 U.S. 712, 32 S.Ct. 841, 56 L.Ed. 1268, the court said: “We agree with appellee’s contention that what was done amounted to an extension of the bonds (or of the indebtedness evidenced by the same), without interest, and are of opinion that such extension is f…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw