S. L. MOSER, APPELLANT,
v.
EDWIN S. LAYMAN

U.S. | 1911-10-23
No. 639
223 U.S. 707 Supreme Court of the United States (1911) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Mottley, 211 U. S. 149; Macfadden v. United States, 213 U. S. 288.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Rixey v. Cox, 235 U.S. 687 (U.S. 1914)
    …Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of juris- • diction upon the authority of. (1) Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 [*688] U. S. 89, 100; David Kaufman & Sons Co. v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610; Cassidy v. Colorado, 223 U. S. 707; (2) In re Converse, 137 U. S. 624, 632; Compagnie Francaise &c. v. Board of Health, 186 U. S. 380, 393; Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U. S. 11, 25-27. Mr. John L. Jeffries and Mr. Jas. B. Catón for the appellant. Mr. J. Garland Pollard and Mr. C…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw