THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
CHARLES R. ASHMANN, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court granted a lawyer's petition to resign from the bar with prejudice, permanently removing him from the rolls without the privilege of reinstatement.
Yes, the Court granted the petition to resign with prejudice, permanently removing the respondent from the rolls of The Florida Bar without the privilege of reinstatement.
“By its judgment filed August 11, 1964, the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar recommends that the petition of the respondent be granted with prejudice to any subsequent application for reinstatement which might be submitted at any time in the future.”
This quote establishes the recommendation made by the Board of Governors regarding the lawyer's resignation.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceCharles R. Ashmann, facing disciplinary proceedings, petitioned the Florida Bar for leave to resign. The Board of Governors recommended granting this …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Resignation From The Florida Bar cases and more on FLexlaw
Pending disciplinary proceedings the respondent Charles R. Ashmann has petitioned for leave to resign from The Florida Bar. By its judgment filed August 11, 1964, the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar recommends that the petition of the respondent be granted with prejudice to any subsequent application for reinstatement which might be submitted at any time in the future.
The recommendation of the Board of Governors is approved. The prayer of the petition of the respondent Charles R. Ash-mann for leave to resign from The Florida *865Bar is granted with prejudice to any subsequent application for reinstatement at any time. Having granted the petition it is further ordered that Charles R. Ashmann be permanently removed from the rolls of The Florida Bar without privilege of reinstatement.
It is so ordered.
DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THOR-NAL, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Williams v. State, 188 So. 2d 320 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)…pon the error in admission of a confession, the State sought to have the Court modify its rule, as stated in the opinion, that the burden of proof is initially upon the State, but the Court remained firm on the point, in the following language (text 167 So. 2d 864): “Florida has long adhered to the rule that preliminary to the introduction of an extrajudicial confession it is the state’s burden to go forward with the evidence to establish its admissibility. This includes the burden to make a prima facie show…
-
In re Rassner, 265 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 1972)…The principle is also recognized in The Florida Bar v. Penny, 164 So. 2d 5 (Fla.1964). Permanency has likewise been recognized upon “resignation without leave for reinstatement” in In re Joel, 160 So. 2d 110 (Fla.1964); The Florida Bar v. Ashmann, 167 So. 2d 864 (Fla.1964); In re Grant, 139 So. 2d 405 (Fla.1962); and In re Talbott, 172 So. 2d 579 (Fla.1965). . Effective 12-1-72 under New Integration Rule 11:10(4), a “disbarred” attorney must be “recycled” and meet requirements of new admissions to the Bar,…