THE EAGLE WHITE LEAD COMPANY, PETITIONER,
v.
ALBERT PFLUGH ET AL.
THE EAGLE WHITE LEAD COMPANY, PETITIONER,
ALBERT PFLUGH ET AL.
220 U.S. 615
Supreme Court of the United States (1911)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Threlkeld, 72 F.2d 464 (10th Cir. 1934)…may bo delegated. Chappell v. United States, 160 U. S. 499, 16 S. Ct. 397, 40 L. Ed. 510; Backus v. Depot Co., 169 U. S. 557, 18 S. Ct. 445, 42 L. Ed. 853; Kaw Valley Drainage Dist. v. Metropolitan Water Co. (C. C. A.) 186 F. 315, certiorari denied 220 U. S. 615, 31 S. Ct. 719, 55 L. Ed. 610; United States v. O’Neill (D. C.) 198 F. 677. It is contended, however, that the law authorizing condemnation of private property for public use does not apply to a case of this kind. Tho national forests throughout th…
-
Ambrosia Chocolate Co. v. Ambrosia Cake Bakery, Inc., 165 F.2d 693 (4th Cir. 1947)…F. 407, L.R.A. 1918C, 1039. The utter inapplicability to the instant case of Chief Justice Fuller’s opinion in the Menendez case is aptly shown by Circuit Judge Buffington in Pflugh v. Eagle White Lead Co., 3 Cir., 185 F. 769, 772, certiorari denied 220 U.S. 615, 31 S.Ct. 719, 55 L.Ed. 610: “We are not unmindful of Menendez v. Holt, 128 U.S. [514,] 524, 9 S.Ct. 143, 32 L.Ed. 526, and other cases cited in the opinion below, that mere failure to enforce trade-mark rights will not preclude injunctive relief w…