E. F. SWIFT ET AL., PETITIONERS,
v.
LESTER M. DAVID

U.S. | 1910-11-28
No. 755
218 U.S. 679 Supreme Court of the United States (1910) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Hall v. Wilson (N.D. Tex. 1929)
    …. St. Louis Railway Co. (C. C.) 40 F. 426; High on Receivers (4th Ed.) 544. This general statement is subject to the rule that, since he is an officer of the court, he may not be sued without its consent, Willcox v. Jones (C. C. A.) 177 F. 870; Id., 218 U. S. 679, 31 S. Ct. 227, 54 L. Ed. 1207. [3,4] The answering of the second question brings us to the third. Eor the purpose of nullifying the inconvenience to the litigant of seeking permission from the appointing chancellor for the right to sue his receiver…
    1 / 2

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw