THE MERRIMACK RIVER SAVINGS BANK, APPELLANT,
v.
THE CITY OF CLAY CENTER, KANSAS, ET AL.
THE MERRIMACK RIVER SAVINGS BANK, APPELLANT,
THE CITY OF CLAY CENTER, KANSAS, ET AL.
218 U.S. 665
Supreme Court of the United States (1910)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Drew v. Thaw, 235 U.S. 432 (U.S. 1914)
-
Fowler v. Ross, 196 F.2d 25 (D.C. Cir. 1952)…841 (opinion of Justice Swiggart, and authorities there cited), certiorari denied 292 U.S. 638, 54 S.Ct. 717, 78 L.Ed. 1491;4 see also Strassheim v. Daily, 221 U.S. 280, 285, 31 S.Ct. 558, 55 L.Ed. 735; Ex parte Hoffstot, C.C., 180 F. 240, affirmed 218 U.S. 665, 31 S.Ct. 222, 54 L.Ed. 1201; United States ex rel. Miller v. Walsh, 7 Cir., 182 F. 2d 264; Kay v. State, 34 Ala.App. 8, 37 So. 2d 525. And see, generally, Johnson v. Matthews, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 376, 380, 182 F. 2d 677, 681, certiorari denied 340 U.S.…
-
United States ex rel. Miller v. Walsh, 182 F.2d 264 (7th Cir. 1950)…in the Daily case, is perhaps even a stronger authority against petitioner’s position and while this was the opinion of a District Court it takes on added significance because it was affirmed without opinion by the Supreme Court. Hoffstot v. Flood, 218 U.S. 665, 31 S.Ct. 222, 54 L.Ed. 1201. There it was held that a citizen of New York was subject to extradition upon demand of the State of Pennsylvania even though admittedly he was not in the latter State on the date the offense was alleged to have been co…