ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
v.
SHEEGOG, ADMINISTRATOR
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
SHEEGOG, ADMINISTRATOR
217 U.S. 599
Supreme Court of the United States (1910)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ford et ux. v. Roxana Petroleum Corp. (N.D. Tex. 1929)…& O. Ry. Co., 151 Ky. 553, 152 S. W. 538; Landers v. Cincinnati, etc., Ry. Co., 156 Ky. 301, 160 S. W. 1050. But the question of delay seems to be a controlling one. Morgan’s L. & T. Ry. Co. v. Street, 57 Tex. Civ. App. 194, 122 S. W. 270, affirmed 217 U. S. 599, 30 S. Ct. 696, 54 L. Ed. 897. This may not be overturned by the courtesy of counsel. The dislike to interrupt a [*767] trial for the purpose of applying for a removal does not successfully attaek the rule. The books do not disclose a ease exactly…