GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY
v.
METROPOLITAN STREET RAILWAY COMPANY

U.S. | 1909-11-15
No. 607
215 U.S. 587 Supreme Court of the United States (1909)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal in this case for lack of jurisdiction, without addressing the merits of the underlying dispute between Guaranty Trust Company and Metropolitan Street Railway Company.


© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Carey v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co., 150 U. S. 170; In re Lennon, 150 U. S. 393; Cornell v. Green, 163 U. S. 75; Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Co. v. Hanley, 205 U. S. 225; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71; Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89; Louisville Trust Co. v. Knott, 191 U. S. 225; United States v. Larkin, 208 U. S. 333; Atlantic Trust Co. v. Chapman, Receiver, 208 U. S. 360; Bien v. Robinson, Receiver, 208 U. S. 423; Delmar Jockey Club v. Missouri, 210 U. S. 324; and see In re Metropolitan Railway Receivership, 208 U. S. 90; Guaranty Trust Co. v. Metropolitan Street Ry. Co., 166 Fed. Rep. 569; 168 Fed. Rep. 937; 170 Fed. Rep. 335; 170 Fed. Rep. 625; 170 Fed. Rep. 626; 171 Fed. Rep. 1014; 171 Fed. Rep. 1015; 171 Fed. Rep. 1019; Morton Trust Co. v. Metropolitan Street Ry. Co., 170 Fed. Rep. 336; Guaranty Trust Co. v. Second Ave. Ry. Co., 171 Fed. Rep. 1020; Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. Metropolitan Street Ry. Co., 170 Fed. Rep. 623.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited (12 total)

View all 12 cited authorities →

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw