CORN PRODUCTS REFINING COMPANY, PETITIONER,
v.
GEORGE F. HARDING ET AL.
CORN PRODUCTS REFINING COMPANY, PETITIONER,
GEORGE F. HARDING ET AL.
214 U.S. 515
Supreme Court of the United States (1909)
Caution
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. The T. Eaton Co. Ltd. & John David Eaton, 234 F.2d 633 (2d Cir. 1956)…can cases which have involved acts of unfair competition committed in other countries have ignored these conflict-of-laws principles. In Vacuum Oil Co. v. Eagle Oil Co., C.C.N.J. 1907, 154 F. 867, affirmed 3 Cir., 1908, 162 F. 671, certiorari denied 214 U.S. 515, 29 S.Ct. 696, 53 L.Ed. 1063, and Morris v. Altstedter, 1916, 93 Misc. 329, 156 N.Y.S. 1103, the courts presumed that the laws concerning unfair competition of every civilized country were identical to those of the forum. In Hecker-H-O Co. v. Hollan…
-
George W. Luft Co., Inc. v. Zande Cosm. Co., Inc., 142 F.2d 536 (2d Cir. 1944)…e United States which are exclusively concerned with such foreign markets. In support of an affirmative answer the plaintiff relies upon two cases, Vacuum Oil Co. v. Eagle Oil Co., C.C.N.J., 154 F. 867, affirmed 3 Cir., 162 F. 671, certiorari denied 214 U.S. 515, 29 S.Ct. 696, 53 L.Ed. 1063, and Hecker H-O Co. v. Holland Food Corp., 2 Cir., 36 F. 2d 767. In the Vacuum Oil case the court found a fraudulent scheme of unfair competition being carried out in essential part within its jurisdiction ; a finding we…