CHICAGO & ALTON RAILWAY COMPANY
v.
UNITED STATES; FAITHORN V. SAME; WANN V. SAME
CHICAGO & ALTON RAILWAY COMPANY
UNITED STATES; FAITHORN V. SAME; WANN V. SAME
212 U.S. 563
Supreme Court of the United States (1909)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 11 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
Judgment affirmed by a divided court, and causes remanded to the District. Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Coal v. Pa. R.R. Co., 230 U.S. 247 (U.S. 1913)…or a service not included in the rate and (b) not mentioned in the tariff. Under the Elkins Act of February 19, 1903, 32 Stat. 847, c. 708 (United States v. Chicago & A. Ry., 148 Fed. Rep. 646; S. C., 156 Fed. Rep. 558, affirmed by a divided court, 212 U. S. 563), and under the Hepburn Act of June 29, 1906, 34 Stat. 584, c. 3591 (Victor Co. v. Atchison Ry., 14. I. C. C. 120) it has been held that the carrier must give notice in the tariff of free cartage, lighterage, ferriage, or any other- accessorial ser…
-
United States v. Pac. & Arctic Ry. & Navigation Co., 228 U.S. 87 (U.S. 1913)
-
The Tap Line Cases, 234 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1914)
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence