CITY OF MIAMI, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
HARRY PLISSNER, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1964-09-15
No. 64-34
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CARROLL and HORTON, JJ.
167 So. 2d 620 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1964) Caution
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Sunad, Inc. v. City of Sarasota, Fla.1960, 122 So.2d 611.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State of Fla. ex rel. Robert G. Boozer v. City OF Miami, 193 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)
    …ions and therefore does not violate due process of law requirements of the Federal or Florida Constitution.” The appellants argue the ordinance should be declared unconstitutional on authority of the case of City of Miami v. Plissner, Fla.App.1964, 167 So. 2d 620, in which a decision of the trial court invalidating a Miami ordinance regulating signs adjacent to expressways was affirmed by this court. The affirmance was without opinion other than the citation of the case of Sunad, Inc. v. City of Sarasota, Fl…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw