SECURITY MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, PETITIONER,

v.

FREDERICK L. MICHAELSEN

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Kissel and Harned, 218 U.S. 601 (U.S. 1910)
• Brown v. Elliott, 225 U.S. 392 (U.S. 1912)
  …earlier acts may have occurred more than three years before the indictment was found. Lorenz v. United States, 24 App. D. C. 337, 387; S. C., 196 U. S. 640; Ware v. United States, 84 C. C. A. 503, 154 Fed. Rep. 577, 12 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1053; S. C., 207 U. S. 588; Jones v. United States, 89 C. C. A. 303, 162 Fed. Rep. 417; S. C., 212 U. S. 576.” If, however, the conspiracies may De regarded as distinct, then one is charged as having been formed at Omaha in April, 1907, and that overt acts were performed the…
• United States v. Read, 658 F.2d 1225 (7th Cir. 1981)
  …698 (1883). To prove that a conspiracy was still “live,” the government had to prove each defendant’s membership in the conspiracy with evidence from within the statute of limitations. Ware v. United States, 154 F. 577, 580 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 207 U.S. 588, 28 S.Ct. 255, 52 L.Ed. 353 (1907). Put another way, the government had to prove that each defendant had not withdrawn prior to the running of the statute of limitations. In Hyde v. United States, 225 U.S. 347, 32 S.Ct. 793, 56 L.Ed. 1114 (1912), t…