LOUIS STEWART, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
LOUIS STEWART, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
207 U.S. 584
Supreme Court of the United States (1907)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Writ of error dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Jacobi v. Alabama, 187 U. S. 133, 386; Railway Company v. McGuire, 196 U. S. 128; Cox v. Texas, 202 U. S. 446; West v. Louisiana, 194 U. S. 258; Chapin v. Fye, 179 U. S. 127; Louisiana v. Deffele, 44 La. Ann. 581, and cases cited; Louisiana v. Hennessy, 44 La. Ann. 805.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sioux City Foundry Co. v. City OF S. Sioux City, 968 F.2d 777 (8th Cir. 1992)…with the City’s electricity customers that include rate terms. City of University Place, 191 N.W. at 434-35; Carr v. Fenstermacher, 119 Neb. 172, 228 N.W. 114 (1929); Omaha Water Co. v. City of Omaha, 147 Fed. 1, 12-13 (8th Cir.1906), appeal dism’d, 207 U.S. 584, 28 S.Ct. 262, 52 L.Ed. 351 (1907). Since 1901 Nebraska cities of the first class have also been delegated the legislative authority to regulate the rates charged by both private and municipally owned electric utilities. See Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 16-679…
Authorities Cited
- West v. Louisiana, 194 U.S. 258 (U.S. 1904)
- Jacobi v. Alabama, 187 U.S. 133 (U.S. 1902)
- Chapin v. FYE, 179 U.S. 127 (U.S. 1900)
- COX v. Texas, 202 U.S. 446 (U.S. 1906)
- Chicago v. McGUIRE, 196 U.S. 128 (U.S. 1905)